Skip to main content

About your Search

20130115
20130123
Search Results 0 to 1 of about 2 (some duplicates have been removed)
it was unconstitutional. >> sean: i'm asking you whether you agree with that. >> i did. >> sean: so you agree with john roberts? >> yes. >> sean: you did? . that's surprising. because i-- in that case, so through the use of the commerce clause, we can now mandate that people buy-- >> no, he didn't say you could use the commerce clause. he said you could not use the commerce clause, what he said was that it was a tax. >> sean: i would argue, the administration sold it as not being a tax. >> and that's-- >> that's problematic to me. >> it's highly problematic and there's a legitimate debate about it, but the court said quite clearly the notion that could be done by the commerce clause was something-- >>, but roberts said that it was the, what you were saying, the american people, that's what elections are for, basically is what he said. >> right. >> sean: but the american
Search Results 0 to 1 of about 2 (some duplicates have been removed)